Blog #10- Where will it Lead?


Where will it Lead?

I thought Infinite Distraction was a well written book that was able to discuss the pros and cons of the distractions we face in todays’ culture. Although towards the end the author sounded a little like a conspiracy theorist, I felt that he was able to make valid points throughout the first few chapters.
            As Mr. Pettman argues, we have not gotten to the point where we react the same to all content we see, but haven’t we to a certain extent? I couldn’t help but think about how to scroll through Instagram & watch stories on Snapchat. On Instagram, I tend to scroll down the page and like (almost) everyone’s post without giving their content a second glance. Could this be showing how I will most likely react to posts in the future? Probably. On Facebook, I am better able to disclose what type of emotion I want to portray when liking a post, which I believe forces me to think about the content more compared to Instagram. I don’t want to put a laughing emoji on content that is sad, etc. This article explains when the best time to use the reactions are, and although I find some of the content ridiculous, it would be really helpful for some people!
            I also liked his point about the “diffusion of positive knowledge.” Thinking about how I was raised, you always had to search for the answer or ask an adult if you were confused. The internet was not there to search for key words or learn random, useless facts. To figure out a math problem my dad and I had to look through the book, not search on YouTube. Schools and Universities would teach critical and conceptual thinking, which helps with our ability to problem solve as we get older. What happens if we are not able to develop this type of thinking and become dependent on instant access? As much as I hate to admit it, I believe we already are dependent on it. Although Pettman discusses the end of all thinking if we continue down this path, I believe we will adapt and develop new ways to collect and store knowledge. It might not be the same as it was before, but it will be better suited for the environment we will be living in. Examples such as better multi-tasking or learning how to make decisions with the full set of information (since it will be readily accessible).
            Even though there are many issues that could arise from the instantaneity of the internet and what it brings, I believe our society will benefit from it in the long run. Just because it is different doesn’t mean that it is bad, it just means we will have to take some time to adjust. The authors thoughts on how our society could crumble apart from these distractions seems a little dramatic, but I grew up as technology was taking off so maybe I am more willing to adapt then he is?

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Blog # 4- Civic Participation & the Feelings You Get

            Civic Participation & the Feelings You Get             How have we, as a society, affected change through social media outlets? I believe the concept of Instantaneity, viewing events as they happen, has shaped outcomes as well as brought new light to events that have happened throughout the world. Not only has social media shaped history by instant coverage but it has given opportunity for engagement to people of all races, gender, SES & location, which has lessened the digital divide.             Instant coverage has affected everyone, with some good and bad outcomes. For the viewer, it is great to see what is unfolding in real time, but there are side effects such as wrong or misleading information broadcasted due to journalists not having appropriate time to vet sources. In contrast, having in...
Read more

Blog #11- Privacy vs. Public Safety

Image
Privacy vs. Public Safety What if we were OK with being watched every second of every day? If we, as a society, had accepted that the government could see our every move and reprimand us for mistakes we have made? It could start small, maybe punishing teenagers for sneaking out of the house at night. Then turn into a larger part of our lives, stopping thieves before a potential robbery or terrorists from entering the United States. Does the ability to stop mass destruction, such as a terrorist attack, outweigh the benefits of individual privacy? We are at a crucial tipping point where we can decide which is more important for our futures, but to me it looks like we have already made the decision: privacy of one does not outweigh the benefits of the mass. I believe we will continue to absorb these advancements, such as facial recognition, as new and exciting ways to use technology, until it becomes too late and our new way of life is something similar to Minority R...
Read more

Blog #7- Wait, What was Her Point Again?

Wait, What was Her Point Again?             Although I enjoyed the idea of Habit + Crisis = Update, and to an extend I do agree, I could not move past the endless amount of unnecessary information.   Chun consistently went on tangents and gave examples that, in my opinion, had nothing to do with what she was discussing. She wanted to further explain her ideas, or more generally, other peoples thoughts/findings, and by doing so she was constantly referring back to other people and giving examples that did not flow well. It seemed that she truly believes the more scholars you reference in a novel the better it will be, and I do not agree whatsoever.             I will say that Chun gave better examples at the beginnings of her specific chapters. Those made sense to her points, gave good clarification on what was to come, and did an overall good job at ge...
Read more